Up for review

August 13, 2015

I do not see why we are highlighting the negatives of peer review, unless the editors of Times Higher Education have already decided that they oppose the current peer review system (“On the receiving end”, Features, 6 August).

As with any other personalised, discipline-specific process, peer review has its share of flaws, but in my experience it is fair, functional and constructive. That is to say, I have not always agreed with the reviewers, but they have almost without exception been helpful. The only rude review I ever received was for the very first article I submitted, and it did make quite a negative impression. But it was also a useful lesson, as it taught me how not to peer review, something that I have passed on to my own students and junior colleagues.

Moreover, in nearly 15 years of citing from journals in my field, I have never come across an article that I thought had no business being published in that context (that is, in terms of either quality or appropriateness to that journal’s readership). One could argue that the system favours the lowest common denominator rather than the heights of originality, but that’s the nature of scholarship more generally. It is an eye-opener to look back at reviews of works now considered seminal in the field and to see how often those works received lukewarm or even negative reviews at the time of their publication. Good scholarship stands the test of time by emerging at a moment when it is innovative enough to be original, but not so avant-garde that it is incomprehensible or irrelevant.

In the end, we are writing for others, not for ourselves, and thus the judgement of our peers is the best possible litmus test, imperfect though it may be.

Adrian Demos
Via timeshighereducation.co.uk

Twice in my career I have received peer review that read, “This person is clearly new to the field, they need to read…”, followed by a list of material that I had written or edited. I have never been sure how to react to this. I suppose it is a sort of compliment.

Farah Mendlesohn
Anglia Ruskin University

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations