Ucas tariff is on point

April 28, 2016

Tim Gill, the research officer at Cambridge Assessment who says that the Ucas tariff system overvalues both the International Baccalaureate and vocational BTECs, misunderstands the Ucas tariff (“IB and BTEC ‘overvalued’ in Ucas tariff, study finds”, News, 21 April). The tariff is designed as a metric for management information purposes and is used by only a small number of universities to make offers, usually when the admissions decisions are not high stakes. Some universities also use it in their minimum requirements for entry to help students who have a mix of qualification types, such as A levels and BTECs.

That said, it is true that the Ucas tariff does not claim to measure the suitability of one type of qualification against another for progression to different types of courses. Even for A levels, a student with, say, physics A level might be a stronger candidate for a particular course than one with a chemistry A level, despite having the same Ucas tariff points.

The tariff is being reformed for 2017 but it will still use the basic level or challenge of the qualification together with its size to calculate the tariff points. Both these measures are overseen by the UK qualifications regulators.

The fit between a learner’s subject interest and learning style and their future success at degree level is well documented in our Progression Pathways project.

Helen Thorne
Director of external relations, Ucas


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns