Two minds on India

May 12, 2016

Prakash Shah is a little unkind to South Asianists abroad who have to make a living in demanding conditions that implicitly and explicitly enjoin meek intellectual and political conformity (“The battle for the Indian mind”, Features, 5 May).

My own personal recollection as an academic was that to resist viewing India in what was in essence a Cold War paradigm was unwelcome and put one’s career in some jeopardy. By contrast, editorials could compare the Pakistani military dictator Zia ul Haq to Oliver Cromwell and warn India to seek approval for its conduct since Khalistan rhymed with Kurdistan. The late Benazir Bhutto was also compared to Israeli prime minister Golda Meir while Indian premier Indira Gandhi was berated in another editorial for her alleged “Brahminnical” (sic) arrogance.

Revisiting press clippings from an earlier era shows that the archetypal liberal Jawaharlal Nehru, now the mascot of the so-called liberal Indian elite, fared much worse than subsequent nationalist successors such as Indian prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. The Cold War stamp on the perception of India could not be less ambiguous than in the particular hostility towards Nehru, who was determined to retain Indian autonomy on the world stage, while the supposedly nationalist Vajpayee, who sought to befriend the US, has been treated with much less venom.

Rohith Vemula’s death was most unfortunate, but he wasn’t a martyr and his anger towards the Left has been studiously ignored by these lofty academics that include international luminaries such as Charles Taylor. As for Kanhaiya Kumar, the less said about him the better since his ilk seek the dismantling of India, no doubt a Nato goal too that us lesser breeds will determinedly oppose. All of a piece really, and Indian social scientists abroad have written themselves out of the script by engaging in blatant fabrication and slander unlike any other national group of academics outside their own country.

gautam.sen2_298344
Via timeshighereducation.com


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

United Nations peace keeper

Understanding the unwritten rules of graduate study is vital if you want to get the most from your PhD supervision, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

David Parkins Christmas illustration (22 December 2016)

A Dickensian tale, set in today’s university

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration (5 January 2017)

Fixing problems in the academic job market by reducing the number of PhDs would homogenise the sector, argues Tom Cutterham

Houses of Parliament, Westminster, government

There really is no need for the Higher Education and Research Bill, says Anne Sheppard

British dean of US business school also questions the ‘strange’ trend of increasing regulation while reducing state funding in the UK sector