Support surplus

September 1, 2016

It is axiomatic that those who deliver the main mission of a university need support in doing so. Many support staff do feel valued through our constant reinforcement of that axiom (“Professional service staff feel ‘undervalued’, study suggests”, News, 23 August).

It is not always clear why the malcontents on the support side have a beef about where they stand in the primacy of any university’s mission. Perhaps it has something to do with the attempted blurring of the lines between support and delivery. While support staff should support academics, and while we academics should deliver the mission, often new initiatives emanating from “the centre” impede us.

Any new initiative seems to be delivered using the powerful tool of “supporting students”. That a support “facility” exists may suggest (but should not conclude) that it is needed. Academics should have the right to refuse any new initiative, but this right has been diluted. Senior support staff have impacted on assessment choices, teaching styles, feedback timing, office hours, course designs, attendance behaviour, “professional” development…to name but a few – all under the veil of “supporting students”. Growth in the number of support staff suggests that students are incapable of navigating their way through student life.

We should be trimming support, not bolstering it. If support facilities do work as claimed, I find it peculiar that students always seem to find their way to our offices first.

Descartes
Via timeshighereducation.com

“Support staff” implies that we are here to support someone else in their job rather than having our own mission. Human resources would do well to redefine this terminology in job descriptions. Many roles are carried out with little or no connection to academics, but those that are are usually delivered by people with professional skills that academic staff might not always be aware of. Mutual respect is always beneficial.

Supporter
Via timeshighereducation.com


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Tef, results, gold, silver, bronze, teaching excellence framework

The results of the 2017 teaching excellence framework in full. Find out which universities were awarded gold, silver or bronze