Strive towards equilibrium

July 2, 2015

It’s refreshing to hear that once upon a time, the pendulum swung in the other direction with regard to teaching and research (“Look back in wonder: the invention of academic ‘tradition’”, Opinion, 25 June).

Personally, I feel that a healthy equilibrium is yet to be found. We need research, and we need teaching, but the question has to be asked: can you really be a good researcher without first teaching for a number of years? Is it not teaching that really makes you assimilate theories?

Perhaps we should introduce a new model for the fledgling academic: make them teach for a number of years before they embark on a research career.

This may produce a greater understanding of students’ difficulties in acquiring new knowledge, engage undergraduates more, reduce the stress of having to publish for the sake of publication, lead to more insightful research and ultimately put the student at the heart of the university experience.

Maybe this is idealistic, but even so, why not strive towards it?

Richard Hoban

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Summer is upon northern hemisphere academics. But its cherished traditional identity as a time for intensive research is being challenged by the increasing obligations around teaching and administration that often crowd out research entirely during term time. So is the 40/40/20 workload model still sustainable? Respondents to a THE survey suggest not. Nick Mayo hears why

25 July


Featured jobs