Resit rethink

December 1, 2016

While Ivo Arnold is broadly right to argue that resits have limited impact on students’ subsequent performance, our recent research on behalf of the Northern Universities Consortium and the Standards and Classifications Working Group suggests that the picture is more nuanced (“Resits may not improve academic performance, says study”, News, 15 November). In our analysis of nearly 20,000 student results from nine UK universities, students who resat at least one Level 4 module before progressing to Level 5 of their degree were more likely to achieve a good honours degree than those students who were compensated for a proportion of Level 4 failure: 31 per cent compared with 27 per cent. Compensated students, however, were marginally more likely to complete their honours course within three years (30.9 per cent compared with 30.6 per cent for those who resat).

The significance of Arnold’s study and our work is, we feel, that those responsible for designing assessment strategies should base their decisions on the evidence that is available to them in their institutions, rather than relying on received wisdom.

Wayne Turnbull
Liverpool John Moores University

Harvey Woof
ex-University of Wolverhampton


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments