Props for a good show

July 23, 2015

In common with all of Microsoft Office, PowerPoint suffers from “familiarity breeding contempt” (“In praise of PowerPoint”, Opinion, 16 July). Yet I am always amazed by the functionality of such tools in the hands of people who really understand their capabilities.

In my undergraduate days, where I was probably one of the last generations to be taught by “chalk and talk” lecturers, the great advantage of “chalk and talk” was pace. With PowerPoint, it is easier to cram slides full of information and rattle through concepts without giving [students] time to embed some understanding. This, of course, backs up Philip Moriarty’s point that it is the bad workman that blames his tools.

People who approach the planning of presentations by clicking on PowerPoint and putting stuff on slides are probably not going to deliver the best presentations because they aren’t actually planning at all.

Christopher Satterley
Via timeshighereducation.co.uk

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham