Healthy equality

October 8, 2015

Victoria Bateman identifies economics as sexist (“Is economics a sexist science?”, Opinion, 15 September). That may be true of mainstream economics, but it is certainly not true of the field that we work in: health economics. Here at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, there is gender equality among senior health economists: 50 per cent of readers and professors in health economics are female. Leading health economics research units elsewhere in the UK have female directors: the universities of Aberdeen, Birmingham, Leeds and York, Bangor and City universities, and King’s College London, for example.

Why is this the case? Women may be attracted by the subject matter, which includes determinants of fertility, gender inequalities in health and access to services, and the role of women in the health workforce. Female role models may also be important, encouraging junior female academics to seek out an academic environment that they expect to be supportive. For example, two recent presidents of the International Health Economics Association have been women, and 16 of the 20 health economists in our research group in the department of global health and development are women. More negatively, health economics may be seen as “soft” and not of equal status to, for example, macroeconomic theory or industrial organisation. But in terms of social and economic importance – share of GDP, share of government spending or ranking in terms of people’s daily concerns – health is a high priority, and it is positive that so many female economists are choosing to specialise in it.

As economists, it is important that we consider the micro as well as the macro picture that Bateman presents, and give consideration to the relative balance of incentives and disincentives that drive the differential career choices of those who train in economics. At least in health economics, a very warm welcome awaits both men and women who wish to pursue their career in this field.

Anne Mills, deputy director and provost professor of health economics and policy
Richard Smith, dean, Faculty of Public Health, and policy professor of health system economics
Kara Hanson, associate dean for research, Faculty of Public Health, and policy professor of health system economics
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com

Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham