Clear up admissions melee

August 20, 2015

Robert Allison was right to point out in a blog post that the admissions system is confusing and unfair (“Clearing 2015: universities must put students first”, 12 August).

As the recruitment cap is lifted, we are seeing a rise in unconditional offers. These offers lack transparency, devalue A levels and call into question the practice of setting entry requirements at all. They are also based on predicted grades, which can be wildly inaccurate. In 2014, only 21 per cent of students predicted ABB went on to achieve those grades.

A survey by the University and College Union showed that there is real appetite for change among those in admissions. Seven out of 10 respondents supported a move to post-qualification applications. This system would be simpler, eliminating the need for the chaotic clearing and adjustment processes that pick up the pieces when predictions are proved wrong.

As universities continue to expand their numbers, the pressure on the system will only increase, so it’s time for a proper rethink.

Sally Hunt
General secretary, University and College Union

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham