January 17, 1997

In the start of a debate about the pros and cons of a superleague of universities in the United Kingdom, Frank Webster stated that the "1996 research assessment exercise demonstrated nothing if not that research excellence is concentrated in a small number of elite universities". However, while a very small number of universities do very well across the board, excellence in individual subject areas may be distributed in a different way, since many universities contain research excellence.

Many of those whom the Physiological Society represents presented their work for assessment under the physiology unit, where 45 per cent of staff were judged to be in departments awarded 5 or 5-star grades, and under pharmacology, where 53 per cent of staff are in departments awarded 5 or 5-star. However 44 per cent of these internationally competitive researchers are outside Cambridge, Oxford, London and those universities which seem to be pushing hardest for a premier league (THES, December , 1996). The proportion rises to 50 per cent if one considers only researchers whose departments were rated 5-star.

Fortunately for scientific research in the UK neither the Higher Education Funding Council for England nor the Committee of Vice Chancellors and Principals favours the creation of a superleague. Webster's notion that scientific laboratories, whose capital base and personnel will have been developed over years of commitment, can easily be transferred to a cluster of research universities "if staff so desire" beggars belief. Much likelier, their effort would have to be abandoned.

P. R. Stanfield Honorary secretary, The Physiological Society, Department of cell physiology and pharmacology University of Leicester

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns