Enter through Real Life, exit in Nude

March 24, 2000

The Tate's decision to organise its collection around themes rather than around dates is academically sensible.

It is a transparent and convenient method of organising artworks and one that doesn't immediately appear too scholarly. It is, in short, a friendly approach.

And it is an idea other museums are also exploring. An exhibition called "1900", organised by the Royal Academy and shortly to open at the Guggenheim in New York, also sub-divides its content by genre: "A room of portraits", "A room of beautiful women", "A room of still lives" and so on. In putting this exhibition together, the Royal Academy was guided by the American art historian Robert Rosenblum, a man whom I understand to have championed this approach.

So the Tate is getting it right, but not so much breaking new ground as sharing good practice.

Stephen Farthing is Ruskin master of drawing, Oxford University. His book, The Intelligent Person's Guide to Modern Art, will be published by Duckworth in May.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs