Laurie Taylor Column

March 3, 2006


Shock probe into pork pie findings

Dramatic evidence that research carried out by University of Poppleton academics may be flawed has been uncovered by a Poppleton Evening News investigation.

Controversy first broke out when a research team led by Professor Gordon Lapping of the Department of Media and Cultural Studies published the results of a three-year study of pork pie preference in six regions of the UK.

This study, financed by a £750,000 research grant from Poppleton Pork Products plc, claimed that, in independent tests, the Poppleton Extra Large Pork Pie was preferred to five other nationally known extra large pies by nine out of ten respondents.

However, an investigation by this paper now reveals that instead of the usual statistical indices of preference, the study refers to "an awful lot of people preferring the Poppleton product" and "not really very many people at all" admitting to a preference for any of its rivals.

Further investigation by the News reveals that the Poppleton product may also have been favoured by respondents because it was the only one of the sample pies presented to respondents on a gilded plate.

Last night, Professor Lapping defended his team's results. He told the News : "We stand by our scientific conclusion that, on the whole, Poppleton Pork Pies are preferred by nearly everyone."

Asked if this favourable conclusion related in any way to the source of the project's funding, the professor replied: "That is a wholly cynical suggestion. The fact that Poppleton Pork Products plc was prepared to invest such a sizeable sum in a research project of this kind without knowing the favourable outcome in advance is a testimony to their trust in the objectivity of contemporary academic research."

Professor Lapping has been offered early retirement five times.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns