Laurie Taylor column

July 19, 2002

Lapping speaking.

Professor Lapping. It's Jane Seligman. Professor Lapping, I'm not there.

You're not where, Jane?

On the list. I came in yesterday after my holiday and went to the board to look at the degree list and my name is not on there.

I am sure that there is a perfectly simple explanation for this.

Ah, yes, this appears to be what you're after. Jane Seligman: "Degree withheld because of non-payment of outstanding tuition fees."

How do you mean - withheld? Is it an upper or a lower? Where is it?

Technically, it isn't anywhere. The university's rules state that a student is not deemedto have graduated until such time as outstanding tuition fees - in your case a matter of £1,750 - have been discharged.

So nobody knows my result?

Your result is in abeyance. But I am allowed to say that if you were to deposit a cheque with the bursar for what one might call a substantial proportion of your debt, then the possib-ility of your degree coming out of abeyance would be enhanced.

But supposing it's a fail. I don't want to pay a substantial proportion to bring that out of abeyance.

Without in any way pre-empting the final decision of the Examination Board, I think it would be safe to say that you have a withheld lower second.

Only a lower?

That's right.

I'll tell you what. You give me my miserable lower second and I'll pay the bursar £500 of my tuition fees. Is that a deal?

That, as we say, is a deal. Thank you, Jane.

And very many congratulations on your degree result. It is good to do business with you.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments