Science needs to be given credence as well as cash

As Canadian scientists look forward to a better deal under a new regime, respect for their findings is as vital as fair funding

January 7, 2016
Canadian maple leaf and laboratory test tubes

If the Paris climate change talks that took place before Christmas taught us anything, it is that even those countries that have been running very hard for the past two decades are ultimately unable to hide from the scientific consensus.

Even traditional wreckers of climate deals have finally accepted that a rise in global temperatures of much more than 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels will lead to disaster.

Whether Canada would have signed up to the deal had former prime minister Stephen Harper been in power is open to question.

As our cover feature this week sets out, the Conservative regime seemed to many scientists to be actively antagonistic to science in general and climate science in particular.

The collective sigh of relief from scientists when Harper was drop-kicked out of office last October was testament to the enormous frustration that had built up.

The charge list includes moves to put a greater emphasis on commercialisation of research, and an 8 per cent real-terms decline in the budget for Canada’s research councils.

But the most detested policy of all was the requirement for government scientists to seek official permission before speaking to the press.

What is interesting is that the heat generated by this policy is somewhat disproportionate to the number of people directly affected by it. Since academics at Canadian universities, unlike those in some countries, are not civil servants, they remained free to speak out.

Yet the policy was seen as emblematic of the Harper government’s anti-science agenda, which many regarded as connected to its support for Canada’s oil industry, centred on the tar sands in Alberta (Harper’s power base), which climate scientists regard as particularly dirty in environmental terms.

It was that, above all things, that led scientists to protest outside the Canadian Parliament in 2012 under the banner “no science, no evidence, no truth, no democracy”.

The reference to democracy is instructive. It is often remarked that one of the reasons that democracy has not turned out to be the panacea that the West hoped it would be in countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq is that the benefits attributed to democracy – effective and enlightened government – depend not just on people going out to vote but also on their forming and supporting parties that aspire to benefit the whole country, rather than just one factional interest group.

In a roughly parallel way, you could say that respecting science is about more than just delivering a decent funding settlement and refraining from micromanaging how it is distributed (the fabled Haldane principle). It is also about respecting its findings and incorporating them into policy, rather than ignoring them or – as some believe the Canadian government was seeking to do – actively burying them.

In other words, governments need decent chief scientific advisers, as well as science ministers with the ear of the Treasury. In that sense, the Harper government’s decision to do without a chief scientist may be seen as particularly telling.

If politics trumps science, then we are in a world of trouble whoever’s in office. Global warming may open up the fabled Northwest Passage and lower heating bills in Toronto, but, as Paris delegates agreed, that would be scant consolation in a planet racked by floods, droughts and conflict.

paul.jump@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Coming in from the cold

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest