Zero intolerance

August 11, 2011

Could we please remind ourselves to correct at every opportunity the developing habit of referring to the 20th century as the 1900s?

Of course, the same problem affects other centuries. This evening on BBC2 I heard a historian with a doctorate, who should have known better, mention the mid-1600s when in fact she meant the mid-17th century rather than c.1605.

This misuse of English is resulting in miscommunication, confusion and misunderstanding. How are we to assess students who use a term that is acquiring a dual meaning? Should we give up and refer to the "long 18th century" as the "long 1700s", or the Twentieth Century Society as the 1900s Society?

Zero tolerance for the misuse of zeros! It is dangerous for everyone.

David Wilson, Dalston, Cumbria

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald