Wrong about post-92s 1

February 16, 2007

Alan Sked clearly enjoys lecturing at the London School of Economics; he spends a good chunk of his review of my book University Students Behaving Badly (February 9) telling us what a delightful place it is.

But this leads him to an ill-considered diatribe on the weaknesses of new universities and their students. He offers a simple equivalence: bright students (such as those at the LSE) exhibit good behaviour; less able students are more likely to behave badly. The lecturers I interviewed for my book were from both pre-92 and post-92 universities.

But Sked's support for the ways forward I propose is welcome. It is time to work together to resist student aggression and management oppression.

Deborah Lee.
Nottingham Trent University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October