What are they doing here?

April 2, 2015

London Metropolitan University’s senior management recently found in their own staff survey that 83 per cent have no faith or confidence in their leadership. Their response appears to be to sack as many staff as they can to change the demographics.

They are intent on slashing 165 posts while ignoring warnings from staff and trade unions that these cuts are unnecessary and damaging (“London Met staff on tenterhooks over plan to cut 10% of workforce”, News, 19 March).

Management have a long history of ignoring warnings, to the detriment of staff, students and the health of the institution. For example, in 2012, when Unison and the University and College Union strongly cautioned against entering into partnership with the London School of Business and Finance, they went ahead anyway. There followed an aggressive audit by the Home Office into our visa compliance systems, which then led to the devastating loss of our overseas student licence for a time. The same managers who took that decision are now looking at who should pay the ultimate price for their failures.

Another survey at London Met showed that levels of stress and bullying are high. Management’s answer to these results is to make the redundancy consultation process as stressful as possible. By day 19 of the statutory minimum 45-day consultation period, we are still waiting for the detailed proposals for the removal of 150 posts to be published.

Even though little information has been shared, vice-chancellor John Raftery insists on curtailing our consultation period despite its being Easter, while the director of human resources is on leave, as are the majority of burned-out staff. But instead of resting, we are checking our inboxes for a dreaded email signalling the worst.

It was no surprise that the staff surveys showed dire levels of trust in senior management; what is eyebrow-raising is the continuity of the same managers who have brought us to our knees over the past four years.

Their top-down approach has failed, and we have written to our governors urging them to stop the current plans, look at the mess they have made and listen to our concerns.

If they fail to act yet again, then we will have no choice but to resist the cuts ourselves, through any means at our disposal, alongside the UCU and with the support of our students.

Claire Locke, branch chair
Max Watson, branch secretary

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham