As is shown by Ray Monk's review of Bernard Williams's Truth and Truthfulness ("Up against a tide of denial", THES , November 29), academic philosophers are once again busy fabricating a muddle about truth.
Pitting "defenders" of truth against its alleged "deniers" is a silly and partisan way of putting the issue, except for extremists on both sides.
To claim that what counts as true has to be contextualised according to the occasion is not a denial of truth but a commonsensical lesson of experience in human communication.
"True" is an everyday word with everyday uses that few of us in practice find perplexing. If the 21st century kicks off by trying to resurrect the grand old "problem" of Truth-with-a-capital-T, we are in for a philosophically boring millennium.
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now