The personal pitch

April 23, 2015

As a constituent in Oxford West and Abingdon, I was interested in the review by Danny Dorling of Emma Crewe’s The House of Commons: An Anthropology of MPs at Work (Books, 16 April).

I didn’t vote for Nicola Blackwood, who was returned for the Conservatives in 2010, and have no intention of voting for her in the upcoming general election. However, the suggestion, made three times, that she somehow “stole” her seat in the 2010 general election is quite outrageous. Blackwood’s crime appears to have been to determine what issues were of importance to the electorate in the constituency and to address those issues in campaign literature. All electioneering attempts to focus on voters’ key concerns; Blackwood did nothing more than personalise that electioneering to individuals.

We live in a representative democracy. It does that democracy no good if we decry attempts to represent constituents.

David Prosser
Oxford

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi