The op cit effect

April 17, 2008

I recently wrote a paper on mathematical notation and its automatic treatment that was submitted to a significant conference in the field. In it I had to cite various examples of actual notation.

One referee wrote: "The reference to (11) is inappropriate. Just to cite a badly written paper? One could cite thousands of other poorly written ones. And it gives a citation for that paper now! Consider that simply the number of citations is sometimes taken as a rough estimate for the impact of that paper, so citing it virtually increases the impact factor of (11)."

It seems I have three choices.

(1) Press on, risk rejection of the paper, and if my paper is accepted, give (11) a brownie point?

(2) Delete (11) and make my paper less credible and open to the attack "surely he is exaggerating?"

(3) Have a "covert reference" to (11), for example in a footnote, but not in the list of references. This would seem to be acknowledging that the bean-counters have defeated the scholars.

What do readers think?

James Davenport, Hebron and Medlock professor of information, technology, University of Bath.

Please
or
to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Sponsored