The measure of trust

January 5, 2007

It will need more than watchfulness to ensure that the central purpose of university life remains intact ("Academe's value must be upheld", Leader, December 15).

Neither "modernisation" nor "accountability" per se are threats to the academy.

The real threats are the unaccountability of the old-fashioned managerialist manipulators and the acquiescence of the creatures they appoint to serve them.

The answer is equally old-fashioned - not pro vice-chancellors, but a dose of democracy to make those at the top of the ladder truly accountable to those at the bottom.

Figuring out what you have to do to persuade people to trust you with their votes is a discipline second to none. How many of our academic "leaders" could master it?

P. K. Burgess

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Occupational Health Manager

University Of The West Of Scotland

Senior Veterinary Epidemiologist

Scotland's Rural College (sruc)

Architecture Manager

University Of Leeds

Research Associate

Kings College London