Take a look at taboo

January 31, 2003

It is ironic, if not irresponsible, to suggest we reassess our moral attitude to incest when we fear the family is under threat ("Heart steers head onto right track", THES , January 24).

Our distant ancestors lacked birth control and genetic theory, although according to evolutionary thinkers the benefits of out-breeding vigour were evident in improved survival rates and competitive advantage.

The avoidance of in-breeding is only one hypothesis about the incest taboo.

Others, such as role confusion between kin, suggest a powerful lighting up of the emotional side of the brain.

Another hypothesis is that the incest taboo forced people to seek mates beyond the family, thus underwriting the institution of exogamy, and the foundation of wider social interaction. Perhaps reviewing our attitude to incest might renew interest in the place of the family in society, as a place to search for sexual partners? If you think kinship is important, it is wry to contemplate that reconsidering incestuous relations could plausibly revive the family's beleaguered fortunes, as an increasingly marginalised institution in our culture. At what expense to society and our emotional selves?

Paul Sillitoe
University of Durham

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments