Stamp of approval for rational visa policies (1 of 3)

April 12, 2012

There was some good news in last week's immigration announcements, as strange as it sounds. As well as keeping the overall work-related visa cap static - rather than reducing it owing to lower than expected take-up - the government unveiled important changes to the resident labour market test (RLMT).

For our sector, the RLMT is a piece of red tape that means that employers must prove they cannot find the right candidate in the "resident labour market" before they can bring in foreign talent. In practice, this means advertising the position in the local Jobcentre Plus every six months before every foreign hire - including the infamous example of the UK's leading genetics lab, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, having to advertise more than 100 posts at the local job centre and receiving absolutely no applications in reply.

Following discussions with the Campaign for Science and Engineering and many of our members, the Home Office is significantly relaxing these restrictions. The policy picture isn't perfect, but alongside the government's continuing prioritisation of PhD-level skills in the visa queue, it shows that the department is genuinely engaging with the sector after a rocky start under the coalition. We welcome and applaud this.

We are also hopeful that the sector and the Home Office can use this rapprochement to tackle the outstanding issue of student visas. The problem is clear: our universities need foreign students, and our science and engineering sectors want to employ them, too. The world's brightest students want to come and study here, polling shows that most Britons do not see them as "immigrants", and yet the UK is increasingly seen as unwelcoming compared with our foreign competitors.

The current policy confusion and mixed messages can, and should, be clarified. It is in the interests of both the government and the sector to make sure this happens.

Imran Khan, Director, Campaign for Science and Engineering

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns