Spurious statistics 1

February 21, 2008

The Cranfield study of correlations between 2001 RAE scores against citation counts ("REF will topple RAE stars, report warns", 14 February) is less valuable than it could have been, as it was based on a calculation of average number of citations per article examined. All previous studies (which have shown excellent correlations between RAE scores and citation studies and therefore indicate citation analysis would not greatly affect overall order of RAE score) instead examined total number of citations per department or average number of citations per member of staff. Perhaps the Cranfield authors should be asked to re-run their study following this standard methodology?

Charles Oppenheim
Head of the department of information science
Loughborough University

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments