Sensitive or censor 2

December 24, 2004

Suppose the ethics committee at Durham University forbids me to teach a certain subject, but I decide to exercise my academic freedom (enshrined in law) and teach it anyway. Will I be disciplined? Sacked? If I am invited to Durham as a guest speaker, must my topic be approved in advance by the ethics committee?

However Durham seeks to dress this up, it is nothing less than censorship. Is it too much to hope that Universities UK will issue a public condemnation of the abhorrent initiative Durham has taken, and that the Quality Assurance Agency will warn the university that it risks a judgement of "no confidence" in respect of the management of the quality of its academic programmes unless the ethics committee is abolished?

Geoffrey Alderman
Professor emeritus
Middlesex University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October