Scholars are failing the integrity test 2

September 24, 2009

Once again we have an extraordinary letter that suggests that education is different from any other subject taught at university. I very much doubt that Richard Austen-Baker would agree that lawyers are the worse for having been taught law at university, and that all they need to do is sit in the dock a sufficient number of times to become a proficient lawyer with an understanding of the breadth of the subject.

While studying a subject by itself is insufficient to make one proficient in it, it does give one access to theory and practice. Why does Austen-Baker believe that education is any different?

Tom Franklin, Tom Franklin Consulting Manchester.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments