In his review of Thomas Docherty's The English Question or Academic Freedoms (Books, 20 March), Roy Harris says comparative philology was a moribund subject by the first half of the 20th century. I did it at university a bit later than that. It wasn't moribund then and nor was I! There are currently people with the title of professor of comparative philology at the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. Is Harris suggesting they are in charge of a subject that has rotted in the grave, or did he just forget to say it has revived?
Michael Bulley, Chalon-sur-Saone, France.
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now