REF isn't blind to reality (1 of 2)

January 12, 2012

Miles Hewstone seems to think that the purpose of the research excellence framework is to produce a UK academic league table, whereas in fact it is an exercise in funding allocation and therefore arranged as such ("Sins of omission: REF should give full picture for the taxpayers' sake", 5 January).

While 1* research may be "nationally recognised in terms of originality, significance and rigour", it is only 3* and 4* research that attracts funding. Given this remit, Hewstone's recommendations would increase the workload of what is already a laborious exercise for no obvious purpose.

In addition, the outputs submitted by an institution to a particular subpanel will not necessarily map on to any one department or school. Furthermore, such outputs account for 65 per cent of any unit of assessment's resulting REF profile. The rest is associated with "environment and esteem" (15 per cent) and "impact" (20 per cent), with the number of impact statements required being directly related to the number of outputs submitted. So there would be consequences, particularly for "pockets of excellence", from submitting all staff regardless of output quality.

The REF must not be mistaken for a comprehensive assessment of the UK sector, which has more to offer than research, research, research. If we follow Hewstone's suggestions in terms of his preferred metaphor, they appear to hark back to the days when large numbers of people would take to the football field in an undisciplined manner. The modern rules are preferable as rather than allowing mob rule, they facilitate the fluidity and strategy of the beautiful game.

Nathan Emmerich, Queen's University Belfast

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show