'Random slaughter offset by poaching' (2 of 3)

August 16, 2012

It is certainly odd that Simon Gaskell's response to his critics devotes very little space to their criticisms. He says that the criteria used to fire people "were based on generally recognised academic expectations". Nothing could be further from the truth: simply counting papers (not even weighting them) and using journal impact factor to measure their quality are methods that were utterly discredited years ago.

Queen Mary's Frequently Asked Questions: Restructures and Reviews in Academic Departments 2011-12 document states that the "research-related metrics" used in the School of Biological and Chemical Sciences are the result of "extensive consultation with staff and include both the Australian (Research Council) journal classification system as well as impact factor".

But a year ago, Kim Carr, at that time the Australian minister for innovation, industry, science and research, said that setting targets for publication in A and A* journals had encouraged "ill-informed, undesirable behaviour in the management of research". This had led him "to remove the rankings, based on the ARC's expert advice".

It seems that Gaskell is unaware of this, since he is enforcing the "ill-informed, undesirable behaviour in the management of research" that Australia has dropped.

The UK has dropped it, too. Is Gaskell not aware of the instructions for the research excellence framework? They state: "No sub-panel will make any use of journal impact factors, rankings, lists or the perceived standing of publishers in assessing the quality of research outputs."

The people Gaskell seeks to please have condemned his methods. If that is not "bringing your university into disrepute", I don't know what is.

David Colquhoun, Professor of pharmacology, University College London

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show