Raising the alarm

July 3, 2008

Sir Colin Campbell's claim that the arrests of the "Nottingham Two" is not a matter of academic freedom (Letters, 19 June) is not acceptable. He essentially admits the charges laid at his door by three of his own academics, that the University of Nottingham's "risk assessment" mentality led to two innocent people being wrongfully arrested and detained without anyone bothering to ask the tutors of the student concerned whether the possession of an al-Qaeda training manual (freely available online and in bookstores) was legitimate for someone studying terrorism. Rizwaan Sabir's tutors are, in fact, of the opinion that it was entirely legitimate but, according to a police notice issued to Sabir on his release on 20 May, "The University authorities have now made clear that possession of this material is not required for the purpose of your course of study nor do they consider it legitimate for you to possess it for research purposes." Nottingham academics are still awaiting clarification as to what the university told the police and under whose authority. They are also seeking clarification about concerns that police stop-and-search powers were used illegally on campus. The police note threatened the possibility of "arrest and further detention" if Sabir looked at such material again.

If it stands, can one imagine a clearer blow to the academic freedom of Sabir, his fellow students and anyone who wishes to conduct research on controversial subjects free from harassment and intimidation? It is for these reasons that I and 34 fellow research students from the universities of Oxford, London, Manchester, Westminster, Kent and the London School of Economics have written to Sir Colin to express our profound alarm at the way the Nottingham Two have been mistreated by his administration and calling on him to give them support and to work with his own academics to ensure academic freedom is protected in the future.

Lee Jones, Nuffield College, Oxford.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Senior Lecturer in Law

University Of The West Of England (uwe)

Lecturer in Marketing

Edinburgh Napier University

Resource Planner

Bpp University