Question time is overdue

August 30, 2012

It is a matter of common knowledge that the Higher Education Funding Council for England has set up a panel to advise it on the future of special factor funding for the institutes of the University of London's School of Advanced Study, funding hitherto justified by their importance for research in a national and international context. However, a diligent search has revealed no evidence that the views of users in the UK or elsewhere are being sought.

Libraries such as the Warburg Institute Library are crucial for domestic and foreign scholars, including Parisian ones. It seems extraordinary that Hefce is not collecting external evidence on the two essential questions: which facilities do users value? In what framework can limited resources be spent best?

Jean-Louis Ferrary, Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, Paris

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree
A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy