Prejudicial enquiries

March 22, 2012

You say that the Academic Reputation Survey is based on the "considered, expert judgement of senior, published academics" ("Informed opinion at the heart of the matter", Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings' supplement, 15 March). But Malcolm Gladwell, quoted in the same article, is probably correct when he observes that such an exercise is more likely to be a survey of prejudices.

In my university, periodic course reviews require a group of knowledgeable people to spend several days studying documents and interviewing staff and students before coming to a conclusion about the quality of a single course. It is hard to see how the majority of your respondents can have worthwhile insights about whole institutions - or even about teaching in a broad disciplinary field within them - when they may be thousands of miles away, with their primary academic experience gained in a quite different university culture.

Paul Temple, Co-director, Centre for Higher Education Studies, Institute of Education, University of London

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns