Poor spin-off returns 1

February 18, 2005

No one can be opposed to the idea of maximising the commercial benefits of academic research but there are, as the Lambert report says, "too many unsustainable spin-offs".

The dispersal of public cash into hopeless small ventures is a terrible waste. The penny packet approach of a few hundred thousand public pounds, a day's "entrepreneurship" training and three academics spun off is depressing.

The resources need to chase fewer, larger and better staffed businesses with a chance of making more of an impression. The aim should be to generate globally significant businesses, not to fill incubator units in science parks.

Jon Moulton
Managing partner, Alchemy

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October