Peerless ideas

January 10, 2008

Stevan Harnad complains about "so much noise and so little sense" in regard to the post-research assessment exercise metrics debate, but validation of a metric is not achieved by demonstrating correlation.

When the Treasury suggested replacing peer review by metrics, we pointed out that many factors correlated with the average RAE grade of UK universities and colleges. My favourite was the numbers of gardeners each higher education institution employed, but the number of nursery nurses was also a good indicator of research quality. That no longer seems to be the case, which shows how easily these signals can drift!

Jonathan Adams,
Director, Evidence Ltd.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs