Paradigmatic prison

November 20, 2008

Edzard Ernst (Letters, 6 November) is wrong in claiming that students of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) do not understand "critical thinking".

Precisely the reverse is the case, with CAM students being encouraged to think outside of the status-quo-preserving positivistic box.

Ernst betrays an incapacity to think outside of the "scientistic" world view that he seems to inhabit uncritically. He repeats the incoherent and internally inconsistent errors that, in some quarters, give his beloved empirical science such a bad name - the arrogant paradigm-bound assumption that any view that questions his own definition of "science" is necessarily "anti-scientific" and "pseudoscientific", and that conducting "research" (no doubt the positivistic, randomised controlled trial version thereof) is the only mark of true science.

Any expanded or ontologically different view about what a valid, sustainable "science" might consist in is axiomatically ruled out by the kind of dogmatic position Ernst inhabits.

Ernst could do far worse than revisit Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, Sir Karl Popper and other philosophers of science, on reading whom he just might cultivate a bit more humility about the narrowly circumscribed scientific world view he currently occupies. Then, perhaps, CAM students and academics might really be able to have a mutually enlightening and scientifically progressive conversation with him.

Richard House, Research Centre for Therapeutic Education, Roehampton University.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns