Nul points for top ten journal idea 5

February 4, 2005

The pressure on academics to publish in so-called "prestigious" journals is already having a detrimental impact on the likelihood of writing for, and working with, campaigning groups. Such activities, while socially progressive, count for absolutely nothing in the marketised world of the research assessment exercise. Academic freedom, social relevance and intellectual innovation are all placed at risk by a game that will have the predictable outcome of making the rich universities yet richer, the poor even poorer.

Joe Sim and Steve Tombs
Liverpool John Moores University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

Student Systems Manager

Edinburgh Napier University

Clinical Practitioner, Faculty of Dentistry

The University Of Hong Kong

Research Assistant, Grant

United Arab Emirates University