Not thought out

June 18, 2009

I see from an ad in Times Higher Education that the Russell Group's role is to provide "thought leadership" to "the UK's 20 leading research-intensive universities". The ad talks of "a robust evidence base", so presumably the claim to be the top 20 has watertight support. Yet it's hard to believe that the universities are really that good: no one in them seems to have told the Russell Group that "thought leadership" stinks. Will "member of the Russell Group" be replaced with the more concise and compliant descriptor "thought follower"?

John Robinson, University of York.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns