Non-STEM Nomeclature 2

March 6, 2008

As an economist, I suppose I am a non-STEMMER. But with the increasingly frequent use of the terms STEM and non-STEM in policy circles, I worry about my discipline's legitimacy. What we need is a collective name that places us in the mainstream rather than making us sound like deviants. Consequently, to indicate the legitimacy and vibrancy of non-STEM subjects, I propose that we talk about PETALS (philosophy, economics, theology, arts, languages and social science).

Of course, some may find this label excessively flamboyant. If so, what about HEADS (humanities, economics, arts, divinity and social science)? After all, stems without petals or heads are generally pretty dull things.

John Beath, School of Economics and Finance, University of St Andrews.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October