No laughing matter

March 17, 2006

So, Neil Mercer considers my comments on the doubtful merits of "research-based" teaching methods and the role of academics in schools of education to be "laughable" (Letters, March 3).

He asserts that educationists have had no influence on teaching in schools and are therefore not responsible for the declining preparedness of students arriving at universities.

May I point out that the disparagement of phonics in teaching reading, the devising and adoption of "look and say", "real books" and "positive marking" were not dreamt up by politicians. These ideas were research-based and came from academic educationists. They have had a disastrous effect on pupils' learning, and contributed to the oft-complained about lack of knowledge, academic skills and even basic literacy and numeracy among university freshers.

Perhaps Mercer would like to laugh these off, too; most of us are more inclined to cry.

Richard Austen-Baker Coventry

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs

Student Researcher

University Of Greenwich

Recruitment Officer (Channel Management)

University College Dublin (ucd)

Assistant Professor in Finance

Durham University

Research Associate

Kings College London