No invitation necessary

March 5, 2015

The article “Social science ‘critical’ to innovation” (26 February) may have created an erroneous impression.

The British Academy spans the social sciences and humanities and works with a range of partner organisations – universities, learned societies, trusts and foundations – to advance the interests of our many disciplines. We have a particularly close working relationship with the UK’s other national academies: the Royal Society, the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Academy of Medical Sciences. The question of “not inviting” other bodies to contribute to our recent joint report Building a Stronger Future (to which the article alludes) did not arise because, between them, the four national academies provide a range of independent and strategic advice to the government that represents the full spectrum of science and research. Each of us also receives funding from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to help us to support excellent research.

Robin Jackson
Chief executive and secretary, British Academy

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham