No feedback loop, no way to improve (3 of 3)

March 15, 2012

Feedback from students is an essential element of any pedagogic process: without it, education is reduced to indoctrination. Standardised evaluation forms and formal box-ticking exercises such as the NSS are not an effective means of providing such feedback. Only when the pedagogic relationship is seen and practised as an ongoing dialogue involving regular face-to-face interactions between students and their tutors and lecturers can such feedback be integrated into the learning process and thereby acted upon.

With staff-to-student ratios having declined over the past three decades from a high of 1:8 to more than 1:22, universities are no longer providing the conditions necessary for strong, interactive and vibrant cultures of learning. Students are being denied the opportunity of becoming independent learners, not through overdirection, but through a lack of contact hours and detailed attention to written work.

Far from challenging the status quo, Furedi supports it by endorsing pedagogic practices that are all of a piece with the chronic underfunding of higher education.

Jon Nixon, Kendal, Cumbria

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Technical Officer (Paramedic)

Staffordshire University

Professor in Marketing

Henley Business School

Lecturer or Senior Lecturer in Social Work

University Of The West Of Scotland

Research Service Manager

London School Of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (lshtm)
See all jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way