Money talks 1

April 2, 2009

It is extraordinary that Keith Hamill, president of the University of Nottingham council, should write without embarrassment to protest that you reported the salary of Sir Colin Campbell, former vice-chancellor of Nottingham, as £585,000 when it was only £308,000. His point was that although Sir Colin did receive the rest of the cash, technically it did not count as salary (Letters, 26 March).

How can he not realise that to make such a "correction" is almost as obscene as the salary figures themselves? At a time when tens of thousands of people are losing their jobs, when many in the academic world face an uncertain future, and when stratospheric, so-called competitive salaries for business leaders are being questioned, anyone with the slightest sensitivity would keep their counsel. Could a more marked divorce from real-world concerns be imagined?

Howard Moss, Swansea.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Senior Lecturer in Law

University Of The West Of England (uwe)

Lecturer in Marketing

Edinburgh Napier University

Resource Planner

Bpp University