Measures to REFer to

May 14, 2015

The suggestion to rank institutions according to quality-related funding per staff member submitted to the research excellence framework is problematic, and not only because some research fields are much more expensive than others (“Can you win by fielding the whole team?”, Research intelligence, 7 May). Such a ranking is also distorted by institutional differences in staff selectivity: REF-excluded staff are awarded zero QR funding but are not counted.

An alternative, which would lead to rankings that are more informative and would also reduce the institutional tension between league table position and QR funding, is to use a “quality per researcher” measure, in which every REF-eligible researcher is counted, and where the “quality” score is similar to grade point average but with the GPA weights of 4, 3, 2, 1 and 0 for REF quality levels replaced by the weights that determine QR funding. This is one of the conclusions reached by a working party set up by the Royal Statistical Society to consider how rankings based on REF results could be improved.

The report of the society’s working party (www.rss.org.uk/ref) also makes some related suggestions for the funding councils themselves about REF submission rules and reporting; these include elimination of the distorting “threshold” effect of the REF’s formula for the number of impact case studies in each submission.

Peter J. Diggle
President
Royal Statistical Society

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show