Massaging the feedback

December 12, 2013

I note that a number of articles and opinion pieces in THE in recent months have dealt with the value (or lack thereof) of student feedback/evaluation questionnaires.

Many years ago, I learned how best to massage such returns: take over a course for a short period for a colleague on sabbatical, preferably at an entirely different university (students’ unfamiliarity with the lecturer limits their risks and offers some variety in their lives); try to ensure that the course ends just before the Christmas holidays and closes with a “fun” question-and-answer session (ensure there are prizes – I offered organic beer and wine…oh, and chocolates); and, vitally, make friends with the departmental secretary.

When the automated, machine-read evaluation returns came back, I received the highest rating ever recorded in the department: 99 per cent. But there was one outlier – for one student all the marks were in the opposite direction. The sensible departmental secretary reasoned something that the machine couldn’t: the student evidently had misinterpreted the rating scale, so she reversed it. Ergo, 100 per cent for yours truly. (Make sure the secretary gets a Christmas present, too!)

Ron Iphofen
La Rochelle, France

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Technical Officer (Paramedic)

Staffordshire University

Professor in Marketing

Henley Business School

Lecturer or Senior Lecturer in Social Work

University Of The West Of Scotland

Research Service Manager

London School Of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (lshtm)
See all jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

University of Oxford

Reinstatement of professor over age discrimination must force rethink over ‘unfair’ retirement rules, say campaigners