Why should anyone be surprised by the efforts at London Metropolitan University to encourage students to provide good National Student Survey ratings ("Probe ordered into 'manipulation'", 28 February)? This is just a rather unsubtle form of a widespread practice. Rumours have been rife, for example, of similar and successful practices at an institution at the other end of the UK.
Other practices, for example, include institutions adopting the NSS questions in the first and second years as a means of identifying issues that can be used to get better scores in the final year. This is irrespective of, or at the price of, any real improvement in the student learning experience. The concern is with league position, despite the meaninglessness of the tables. Improvement is ignored in most institutions, not least because the survey's generic questions suit no specific context, and the survey is a hopelessly inadequate improvement tool.
Lee Harvey Birmingham.
See The Poppletonian (related story)
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now