Limiting our worldview

March 24, 2011

In his piece "The end is not nigh" (Opinion, 3 March), Sir Adam Roberts argues that we need to be more precise about the threats posed to the humanities and social sciences and less paranoid about them.

In the past month, we have witnessed people in North Africa and the Middle East rising up, rewriting the power balance within states and reshaping the region. In such circumstances, we need much more of the "consciousness" raised by studying the social sciences to understand what has been happening and to shape an appropriate UK government response.

Undergraduate work in politics, economics, sociology or other social science disciplines does not guarantee a heightened and knowledgeable response to world events, but it helps.

That is why we fear the effects of the government's funding plans on social science recruitment. The post-2012 fees regime is likely to smother demand for degrees in, for example, social work or education. Higher fees also pose a risk to postgraduate recruitment, since those graduating in 2015 may not wish to defer repaying their loans by embarking on further study, nor to take on additional debt in the process.

Such an eventuality would further diminish us, given the importance of postgraduate training to so many of our social science-based professions, whether in the public, private or voluntary sector.

Cary Cooper, Chair of council, Academy of Social Sciences

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Knowledge Exchange Manager, Innovate

Royal Holloway, University Of London

Accommodation Assistant

Edinburgh Napier University

Customer Service Advisor

Bpp University

Medical Research Specialist, Anatomy

United Arab Emirates University