Letter: Speak up, academy

June 1, 2001

David Eastwood (Letters, THES , May 18) has misrepresented my point of view.

I did not suggest that the Arts and Humanities Research Board was in any sense "the British Academy's creature", though I have heard the opinion expressed. My position is that the unrepresentative and self-appointed nature of the academy makes it an unsuitable channel for government research money.

For the same reason, I find it unsatisfactory that the academy oversees, with others, the affairs of the AHRB, whether its touch is "light" or not.

It is the academy that should justify its role, not the chief executive of the AHRB.

Martin Dodsworth
Royal Holloway, University of London

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns