Letter: Quality defences (1)

October 26, 2001

How many more times will we hear John Randall's outrageous, endlessly repeated insinuation that British universities are somehow analogous to Railtrack?

His former organisation regularly showed that, with very few exceptions, universities have no big problems of the kind he suggests are endemic to professional organisations.

Indeed, the efforts of the Quality Assurance Agency to ensure standards, which Randall claims have enhanced quality, are almost universally agreed to have themselves caused big quality problems.

No one thinks quality control unimportant: what we need are properly paid external examiners and HMI-style visits to observe and discuss teaching constructively.

Andrew Bowie

Member, QAA Benchmarking Academic Standards Group - Philosophy Department of German, Royal Holloway, University of London

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments