Letter: Fee fears and campaign pledges (1)

June 1, 2001

The news that the Blairite think-tank, the Institute for Public Policy Research, is backing university top-up fees ("Top-ups back to spook Labour", THES , May 25) should alarm all who oppose the emergence (or strengthening) of a two-tier system in higher education.

New universities are penalised by this government's funding regime and the ending of grants has depressed enrolments by those (mature students, those from families without a tradition of higher education) whom the government claims to want to see in higher education.

Differential fees will accelerate this process. I predict that within a few years of their introduction, there will be "real" universities, which offer a range of subjects but charge huge fees, and the rest (mostly among the new universities), which will have become glorified technical colleges with a small range of subjects.

Despite a few scholarships for the high-status institutions, for most students admission will depend at least as much on ability to pay as on academic prowess. As usual, students from upper and middle-class backgrounds will have many choices as to where and what they study. For the rest, "university" will mean a vocational course in a local technical college - which will still call itself a university even if it offers only a handful of subjects. Meanwhile, new Labour will crow loudly about the extra opportunities it has created in higher education.

As well as re-creating a two-tier system with a vengeance (thus taking us back not only pre-Dearing and pre-Robbins, but pre-1944 as well), this process will have predictable consequences for staff.

Early last year, you printed a letter from me that suggested that education secretary David Blunkett and new Labour were marketising higher education. At the end of this academic year, I face compulsory redundancy from the politics department of a new university, as do more than 50 of my colleagues from a range of departments. This is happening in other universities as well. The root cause of this is the drastic fall in student enrolments prompted by this government's funding policies.

I suggest that rather than waiting for top-up fees to hit, we need to begin a campaign for a proper publicly funded higher education system in which access is by ability and need, not size of bank balance.

In the meantime, thank you Blackstone, Blair, Blunkett; I will remember you on polling day.

Tony Dennis
Leighton Buzzard

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns