The argument for fees or a graduate tax is that as a graduate benefits financially from a degree, he or she should repay the taxpayer who footed the bill.
But high-earning graduates pay a higher tax and add value to the economy through services to commerce, industry, medicine and education.
Upfront tuition fees steal from those who will not gain from a degree: students' parents. A special tax would force the graduate to pay twice for a single advantage.
Those higher education leaders (Leading article, THES , November 9) who see higher fees as the way to halt universities' financial decline have little capacity for economics and have moral standards even lower than the government's.
We may then need to address a more fashionable interest. Money cannot be found to avoid the collapse of UK higher education, but it is readily available to flatten much of Afghanistan.
Perhaps we could get somewhere by reminding Tony Blair that the war against terrorism will succeed only with more investment in education and intelligence (not spies).
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now